Recent posts:

“Outstanding new principal investigator” awarded!

Today, I received the award of an “outstanding new principal investigator (PI)” by a worldwide community of over 2500 new principal investigators (i.e., assistant professors). I’m proud of being the first person from Germany and the second person in Europe to have received this award to date. I was elected due to being an example for diversity in research (see my Nature and Science articles), for having a very good publication output (11 publications) since my start as a Freigeist Fellow in 2022, and for my helpful and valuable efforts to support other new PI’s to tackle common challenges. In the interview that accompanies this award, I share my research focus, my challenges, and my strategies in leading my own workgroup.

Photo: © S.Jonek/Bielefeld University

Prestigious Freigeist fellowship awarded!

As a consequence of my successful application to the Volkswagen Foundation, I am pleased to announce that I was selected as one of the few people across all scientific disciplines to be awarded a prestigious Freigeist fellowship. The funding included in this fellowship enables me to become a junior research group leader by starting my own workgroup at Bielefeld University. This makes it possible for us to conduct a six-year interdisciplinary research project called “Plasticity-led evolution in the phenotype of a freshwater snail: from the epigenome to genetic change”. With this research project, we will be tackling the unconventional idea that phenotypic plasticity may lead evolution by inducing non-random genetic change. The results of this project may allow future scientists to better predict evolution and everybody to prepare accordingly. A more detailed description of the project can be found in the German press release from Bielefeld University.

Here you can find a short video by the Volkswagen Foundation that explains what a “Freigeist” is.

Career column published in Nature

I’m happy to announce that my career column was recently published in Nature. In this article, I talk about my scientific career, the universities that I have worked in, my supervisors and my research topics. Furthermore, I highlight the challenges that lip-reading scientists like me face in the academic environment. In addition, I tried to provide some useful guidelines for supervisors and colleagues to collaborate successfully with hearing-impaired scientists like me. From my own experience, scientists with disabilities are often determined to work especially hard to gain recognition by their peers. At the same time, the many unique challenges that disabled scientists face allows them to develop creative out-of-the box thinking. Consequently, supporting them benefits the whole scientific body. This piece has also been well-received on social media, especially on Twitter.

Find the full article here:

Antidepressants and their consequences in freshwater ecosystems

Prescription rates for antidepressants are increasing year-by-year worldwide. At the same time, patients consuming antidepressants excrete a large proportion of these chemicals during their bowel movements. They thus end up in the sewage system, and wastewater treatment plants are unable to filter out these small molecules before forwarding the water into natural water bodies. Consequently, antidepressants and their metabolites are constantly accumulating in natural aquatic ecosystems. Two of the most widespread antidepressants at the moment are fluoxetine and venlafaxine. These chemicals are selective serotonin uptake inhibitors.

Many people are unaware of the consequences of the presence of antidepressants in freshwater ecosystems. Fish are vertebrates that have similar serotonergic systems as humans, making them susceptible to fluoxetine and venlafaxine. These antidepressants decrease the ability of fish to cope with predators, which gets them eaten frequently. They also negatively affect social behaviors – they make fish avoid conspecifics such as potential mates, and can furthermore make them display inappropriate aggression behaviors. The presence of these chemicals also prevents fish from reproducting properly – which leads to fewer offspring.

Furthermore, the consequences of antidepressant exposure are not restricted to a single generation – they are also passed down through the germline and can induce similar effects even in offspring that are themselves unexposed to antidepressants.

Such effects have concerning effects on fish populations in freshwater ecosystems – certain species may hardly reproduce anymore and disappear entirely. Predator populations that are then unable to find prey items may collapse shortly afterwards. This also concerns fishermen that may be unable to catch fish, which may be essential for their livelihood. Algal blooms may take over whole freshwater ecosystems if populations of fish species that forage on algae collapse.

Making people aware of these issues so as to curb the introduction of more antidepressants into freshwater ecosystems is thus of paramount importance.

Therefore, I would like to invite you to read our current review on this issue, which was recently published in Science of the Total Environment.

Photo: © Ajale/

New publication in Nature about the needs of deaf and hard-of-hearing researchers

Recently, I was able to publish a correspondence in Nature on the needs of deaf and hard-of-hearing researchers. After having read several published pieces in Nature that advertise virtual conferences as being more inclusive (see R. Joo, Nature 598, 257 (2021) and K. Powell, Nature 598, 221–223 (2021)), I felt that I had to clarify that virtual conferences can be exclusive to people with other disabilities as needs vary. Technological limitations concering camera quality particularly constrain deaf and hard-of-hearing researchers from participating in virtual conferences. Inclusiveness could thus be bolstered by meeting organizers including live captions during presentations and discussions. The article has already garnered attention on international social media.

Find the full article here:

Logo image: ©

Different information sources during transgenerational plasticity – which one has the greatest impact on social behavior?

Transgenerational plasticity is a useful ability. To enable this process, parents collect information about their environment during their lifetime, and then pass this information down to offspring. This information then allows young animals to prepare themselves ideally to live in the same environment.

Over the last decades, many different ways how information can be transmitted across generations have been identified. For example, both mothers and fathers can transmit epigenetic marks (epialleles) together with their DNA within sperm and eggs. Mothers can also embed hormones within the eggs. Fathers can alter their seminal fluid. Furthermore, parents can communicate information to eggs by handling them differently during parental care. And lastly, offspring can also perceive their environment themselves.

Now, which information is more important? This has been a long unresolved question that I wanted to tackle in my research. For this purpose, I conducted a large experiment with the model system Pimephales promelas that forms shoals as a distinct social behavior. Under high predation risk, shoals are dense so that individuals are not getting eaten. However, as in other social animals, forming dense shoals also has disadvantages as it leads to more competition, less food and to greater transmission risk of pathogens – doing so is clearly not always optimal. Hence, like other animals these fish are known to adjust their shoaling density dependent on the level of perceived risk.

This trade-off between the costs and benefits of antipredator responses is what leads to a hypothesis developed by Lima and Bednekoff in 1999. This theory is called the risk allocation hypothesis. It predicts that when predation risk is constantly high, it is beneficial for individuals to respond with clear antipredator defenses only during immediate predator attacks, and not all the time as this would not allow individuals to gather enough food. In contrast, when predation risk is usually low, and individuals can forage all the time, which allows them to be full, it is better to respond to sudden predation events with clear, long-term antipredator responses. In a shoaling context, that means that when predation risk is believed to be high, shoals should be less responsive to a single risky event, but the opposite pattern should emerge in low-risk environments.

I exposed mothers, fathers, males that provided parental care (in this species parental care is solely provided by fathers) and offspring themselves to either high predation risk as communicated through exposure to alarm cues – or to low predation risk as simulated by exposure to tap water. Some of these treatments involved parental care while offspring were still inside eggs, others did not. By combining these treatments, I reached 12 different combinations and tested shoaling behavior in 2810 one-month old offspring. For this purpose, I assessed how close offspring swam to each other before and after a simulated predator attack.

Interestingly, treatments that involved parental care consistently caused offspring to form densest and least dense shoals, respectively. When the caring individual did not experience risk, offspring shoals were loose and were very sensitive to the simulated predator attack. However, when the male that provided care had perceived high predation risk prior to the care period, offspring formed dense shoals and were less sensitive to the simulated predator attack.

Without parental care, maternal experience with high risk was more important than paternal experience, but offspring responded most appropriately when both parents were exposed to either high or low risk. The risk information that offspring assessed themselves was only important when no risk information was transmitted from parents (i.e., when parents were never exposed to risk).
Taken together, this research highlights the high relative importance of parental care during the embryonal period (while offspring are still within their eggs) for the formation of optimal social behavior in the next generation. Many studies on transgenerational plasticity explicitly exclude parental care from their experimental design, and the results here show that this practice may lead to incorrect consequences regarding the relevance of transgenerational plasticity in allowing animals to cope with environmental change.

This study was published in Open Access format at BMC Ecology and Evolution. That means, it is freely available to everyone, and you are welcome to take a peek if you are interested in reading more details. It is the first transgenerational plasticity study that has arisen from my stay at the University of Saskatchewan, Canada – and more are to come.

Vertebrate immune systems can prepare themselves for a future possibility of injury – a fish study

Our immune systems are very effective at protecting us from many pathogens that can cause diseases. When we get injured or when foreign matter enters our bodies, the immune system reacts by producing cells and antibodies that attack and eliminate pathogens. As the vertebrate immune system can take many forms and shapes dependent on what is required for effective defenses against pathogens, it is clearly plastic.

But are vertebrate immune systems also able to prepare themselves for possible future injury long before injury, before any pathogen enters the bloodstream? To address this question, I conducted a long-term experiment on the cichlid Pelvicachromis taeniatus. Predator attacks are clearly known to cause injury, and it would be beneficial for individual immune systems to prepare ahead of time before a predator attack actually occurs – so they can respond faster to injury.

Over a four-year period, we exposed cichlids to either perceived high predation risk as communicated through conspecific alarm cues – which are perceived as an odor – or to a control treatment. Then, we sampled their blood, and assessed the number of different white blood cells.

Individuals that had been exposed to perceived predation risk had more white blood cells than controls. This was because they had almost twice as many lymphocytes as controls. Lymphocytes are the most frequent white blood cell type and include cells that directly attack and kill pathogens as well as those that produce antibodies. Thus, the presence of more lymphocytes in risk-exposed individuals suggests the immune system prepared itself for future injury.

However, the greater production of lymphocytes is not without cost. Greater cell multiplication rates also increase the risk of cancer such as leukemia. This is why it makes sense to boost lymphocyte production only when odors are perceived that suggest future attacks on the individual.

More detail about this study can be found at Oecologia, where it was recently published.

Bielefeld Young Researcher’s funding acquired!

As a consequence of my successful application to the Bielefelder Nachwuchsfonds at Bielefeld University, I am pleased to announce that I have been awarded a one-year Bielefeld Young Researcher’s fund. This “career-bridge” stipend from Bielefeld University will allow me to prepare and submit proposals for 6-year future research projects on the snail Physella acuta and to complete the analysis as well as the publication of the vast amount of data that I have collected during my previous two-year research fellowship at the University of Saskatchewan in Canada.

The disastrous effects of the BPA replacement Bisphenol S (BPS) on fish behavior

Bisphenol A was widely used as an additive in the production of plastics until people became aware that it leaches from plastics into food and water, and has estrogen-disrupting effects in vertebrates. Thus, large parts of the plastics industry have replaced Bisphenol A with Bisphenol S (BPS), while sometimes explicitly advertising these products as “BPA-free”.

However, mounting evidence suggests that BPS may likewise have estrogen-mimicking effects and have detrimental effects on vertebrates. At the same time, incomplete elimination of this chemical by wastewater treatment plants led to the accumulation of BPS in aquatic ecosystems throughout the world.

We thus ventured out to test whether BPS concentrations that are present in natural environments have detrimental effects on the social behavior of zebrafish (Danio rerio).
For this purpose, we exposed adult zebrafish to different concentrations of BPS, to estradiol, and to a water control for 75 days. Afterwards, we investigated their shoaling behavior, their group preference and their activity. In addition, we assessed the effects of these treatments on mRNA expression of important neuropeptide signaling pathways within the zebrafish brain.
We found that exposure to Bisphenol S decreased shoaling density of exposed zebrafish. Furthermore, exposed fish were less interested in associating with conspecifics. This decreases the benefits of shoaling, which is, similar to other forms of animal grouping, mainly protection from predators. Activity was unaffected by BPS exposure.

Analysis of mRNA expression revealed that these changes may be consequences of BPS-disrupted isotocinergic and vasotoncinergic neuro-endocrine systems. Isotocin is the fish equivalent to oxytocin (a human hormone that is relevant for social bonding, reproduction, childbirth and the period following childbirth), and vasotocin is the fish equivalent of vasopressin (a human hormone suggested to also play a role in social behavior, sexual motivation and pair bonding).

If BPS-exposed fish are unable to cope with the presence of predators, whole fish populations may be eradicated, which is likely to have cascading effects on higher food-web levels. This showcases how the ubiquitous presence of BPS may have devastating effects on aquatic ecosystems – which may, among other consequences – crucially affect the livelihood of fishermen. We thus need to strive to reduce the use of not only BPA but also of BPS during the manufacturing process of plastics.

The detailed report of this experiment and a more specialized discussion can be found in our recent publication in Environmental Pollution.

Photo: © Steven Depolo